再看網站分級制度

最近「出版品分級」是個火熱的話題,而明年即將開始實行的網路分級制度,剛好也在討論的脈絡之內。很不巧的是,澳洲那端傳來的新聞,顯示了國會議員對於網路想像的差異…

No to filtering: Coonan(news.com.au)

“The biggest issue is not so much the money but such an expensive scheme would not necessarily solve the problem and small to medium ISPs (internet service providers) would be driven out of business for little or no benefit,” Senator Coonan said. “What does work is greater information and parental supervision and that is the kind of program that the government is promoting.

兒童及少年福利法第27條的通過,如果以後要算,這筆帳應該落到哪些人的頭上?還有一年,現在應該先來追溯一下(and do some serious research?)才對:

第 27 條

出版品、電腦軟體、電腦網路應予分級;其他有害兒童及少年身心健康之物品經目的事業主管機關認定應予分級者,亦同。

電腦軟體也應予分級?「門(如瀏覽器)」和「工具(如Photoshop)」要怎麼分級?

議題的本身我比較不關心(或是說了解有限)。我好奇的是,什麼樣的共同決策流程,會醞釀出這樣的決策?這樣的決策流程模式,若以合理的推論,應該是不少爭議法案過關的淵藪?

3 thoughts on “再看網站分級制度

  1. 我比較想問的是 分級 是避免青少年身心受害的唯一方式嗎?或最有效的方式?

    我絕對贊成避免青少年身心受害,但卻對分級的效用存著疑問。要不然今日電視有嚴格的分級把關,應該不只是人人都在片頭標上『XX級』了事~

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.