[民防搞什麼] 全社會防衛韌性委員會

日前在總統府和國安會的策動之下,成立了「全社會防衛韌性委員會」。雖然委員會層次頗高,但也面臨了多諸多的疑問。尤其對長期在實務有所貢獻的前線應變人員,例如不少在山陀兒颱風中的眾多義消,義警等,對此委員會的成立目的和功能為何,可說是仍然一頭霧水。

  1. 40萬的「可恃民力」是怎麼算的?
  2. 目前散見於不同部會,可正式稱之為「民力訓練」的是?
  3. 那些「中程計畫」的實際的階段效益是?
  4. 替代役的「民防訓練」又是怎麼回事?
  5. 「防災士」積極擴大訓練,但到底派不派的上用場?
  6. 不少新興團體正式或非正式接取國外的資源,那些訓練項目有何實證?

我們將在本次交流,以白話說明目前對於這個委員會的觀察,並提出若干的看法,提供公眾知情進一步討論的基礎。

*請記得報名以方便我們通知,我們活動前一晚會寄發網路會議連結。

EVENT INFORMATION

Recently, under the initiative of the Presidential Office and the National Security Council, the “Whole-Society Defense Resilience Committee" was established. Although the committee is of a relatively high level, it has also faced numerous questions. Particularly for front-line responders who have made long-term contributions in practical fields—such as many volunteer firefighters and volunteer police officers who were involved in Typhoon Krathon—the purpose and function of this committee remain unclear.

  • How was the figure of 400,000 “reliable civilian force" calculated?  
  • Among the various government agencies, which can formally be considered “civilian force training"?  
  • What are the actual phased benefits of those “mid-term plans"?  
  • What exactly is the “civil defense training" for alternative military service?  
  • While the training for “disaster response specialists" is being actively expanded, will it really be useful?
  • Many emerging organizations, officially or unofficially, receive resources from abroad—what evidence supports the effectiveness of their training programs?

In this discussion, we will use plain language to explain our observations on this committee and offer some insights, providing a basis for public awareness and further discussion.

報名訊息

誰應該參加?

  1. 實務工作者和一線人員
  2. 對於訓練體系研究熱愛的實證者
  3. 對於委員會沒有時間研究但需要知道在幹什麼的人

探索更多來自 T.H. Schee 的內容

訂閱即可透過電子郵件收到最新文章。

發表留言

這個網站採用 Akismet 服務減少垃圾留言。進一步了解 Akismet 如何處理網站訪客的留言資料